I read an article today about a company that is
offering an insurance property to protect property
owners against losses incurred as a result of the
state's power of eminent domain. I had to check my
calendar to see if it was April Fool's Day. I think
this is probably the most useless type of insurance I
have ever seen... and its not cheap! (see
Underwriter Launches Policy to Protect Against Eminent
Domain).
For less than $300 per year, the policy
provides up to $200,000 loss of market value when
the home is sold, plus up to $50,000 to relieve the
expense of moving as a result of eminent domain...
The company claims that this was developed in
response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in
Kelo v. New London. In that case, the Supreme
Court held that a state could use its eminent domain
power to take property from a homeowner and give it to
a private developer for economic redevelopment. The
decision was so alarming that state legislators across
the country began working on legislation that would
protect their constituents from such takings. Some
have been more successful than others, but the
backlash from the Kelo decision likely means
that this type of taking will be more difficult in the
future.
What exactly does this insurance cover?
When the state exercises its eminent domain power,
they are required by the constitution to compensate
the homeowner. That usually means they must pay fair
market value. The policy provides up to $200,000 for
loss of market value, but how is that measured?
Presumably, the loss of market value would have to be
attributable to the eminent domain action which will
result in a payment of fair market value to the
homeowner. Plus the policy will pay up to $50,000 for
moving expenses.
The odds of losing your home to eminent domain seem
very slight and the payout on such a policy will
likely be very limited. Yet, the premium seems fairly
expensive at about $300 per year. Of course, the
company offering the coverage has exactly the opposite
opinion.
[The Ward Group LLC] said the policy offers
more than real protection, it provides “peace of
mind.”
“When you consider the value and limits of
coverage provide and the relatively low premium
amount, we are confident a high percentage of
homeowners will elect to purchase the coverage,”
said Ward.
My advice would be to buy a lottery ticket
- your odds of winning the lottery are probably better
than having your home seized by eminent domain and it
will only cost you $1.00.